Plans and Section.pdf |
INSPIRATION AND IDEAS D.C.’s 11th Street Bridge Park OMA + OLIN Proposal for Zaryadye Park Diller Scofidio + Renfro Seoul memorial park Zhangmiao Exercise Park MY DESIGN BASED ON THAT REFERENCES:
Facade ideas that could help to control public flow and could improve de building design. References: Surry Hills Library and Community Center, Francis-Jones Morehen Thorp and Ferreteria O’Higgins, GH+A - Guilhermo Hevia, Chile. BRISES, FACADE AND ENTRANCE FIRST DESIGN AND MODEL NEW CONFIGURATION (trying to respond to the edges of the plot, plus some little changes) PEDESTRIAN ROUTE IN THE GROUND FLOOR (exhibition space) 1. References: James Simon Gallery entrance, David Chipperfield 2. Serpentine Pavilion, Peter Zumthor MY DRAWs:
CONCEPT, SHAPE AND VOLUME: LIGHT: Research about relation public and private: 1. Macanoo Birmingham Library, Francine Houben 2. TPAC Taipei PerformingArts Center proposal, NL Architects 3. Contest to RJ Nacional Library Annex, Renato Dal Pian & Lilian Dal Pian SUMMARY -strategies used: 1. Create a entry plaza; 2. Create a permeability - usage of glass and openings; 3. Expand the ceiling or part of the building; 4. Open the ground floor DEVELOPING PRIVATE-PUBLIC RELATION:
Program based on 90 students belonging to the 16-18 age. Foyer multipurpose + space to welcome exhibitions, events, among others; + Info point and reception. Administration + Reception; + 01 staff room; + 03 rooms coordinators (01 for music, 01 for theater and dance to 01); + 01 board room. Music + 02 training rooms for 10 students; + 01 training room for 20 students; + 05 individual training rooms with teacher; + Sanitary facilities; + proper circulation area. Theater + 02 training rooms for 20 students; + 02 training rooms for 40 students; + Sanitary facilities; + proper circulation area. Dance + 02 training rooms for 20 students; + 02 training rooms for 40 students; + Sanitary facilities; + proper circulation area. Presentations + Theatre for presentations for up to 300 people (black box); + female and male dressing rooms + auxiliary space. Other + Library; + Coffee place; + Garden + Common room/living space Diagram:1. Laban Dance Centre, Herzog & de Meuron I chose this reference not only because Laban is the largest school for contemporary dance in the world, and one of Europe's leading, and largest, institutions for contemporary dance artist training, but also for your unique design and concepts. MAIN ELEMENTS +This building is surrounded by decaying blocks of council flats, scrap yards and derelict industrial warehouse. +The curving facade (i) is clad in transparent or translucent glass panels - depending on whether the spaces behind then require a view. This flexibility of views - from outside to the inside - is a reference that I want to take in my design as well. +The interior (ii) is designed as a urban streetscape, with a series of corridors, interior courtyards and meeting places around the main theater. The auditorium is the heart of the project which dictad all the other spaces. This ideia to have a central point is corresponded in my project with the curtain piercing the building right in the middle. + Surface more opaque but you can still see through (iii). +Use of selective colors. My project will respond to this as it also is going to have the color of the curtain (red) as a important characteristic. +All activities are intermixed and distributed on two main levels, promoting communication with the entire building. Technical Drawings: 2. Granoff Center Creative Arts, Diller Scofidio & Renfro «In creating the design for the Granoff Center, we needed structural elements that would stimulate the creative process from virtually every aspect of the building. The Granoff Center is a merger of architectural gesture and academic pedagogy. Our strategy was to encourage and illustrate collaboration across every level». Charles Renfro SPACES More than a reference of design, this building is also a reference of spaces. The levels and sublevels makes this project unique and incredible. This idea of transparency - in the inside and outside - is shown in the development of my project as well (i & iii). The sublevels (intervals) corresponds to my design too (iii). + Performance space; +exhibitions; +installations; +outdoor amphitheater; +recital hall; + studios for individual work; + studios for collective work; + labs; + gallery; + smart classroom; + offices There is three mais aspects that made me take this project as a reference: +long structural spans, +high ceilings and +large floor plates, what makes all this places a collaborative environment and in flexible. For this analysis I focused on how this spaces is distributed on the plan and how they are organized. + Transparency inside and outside; + Flexibility of spaces 3. Carpenter Center for the Visual Arts, Le Corbusier
When doing the analysis of Le Corbusier’s building I focused on the spaces, how is the distribution? How does it organizes? How one space connects to each other? This was what I was looking for i=to answer in the next draws. + circulation concentrated in two specific points; + spaces are mostly connected by lobbies; + toilets concentrated in one specific point; + most of the spaces are very generic, what makes it more flexible. The proposal is to create a school of performing arts that is located on the site as a open stage and takes the city as audience. The school of theater, music and dance appropriates what sets the three arts: the silence, the breath and the interval that is what dictates the guidelines of this project. CHOICE OF IDEAS: The idea is to design it as a space of experimentation and exchanges. The proposal of the spaces should provide freedom to students to express their art beyond the classroom and observe each other, making the whole project an envelope that shelters the rehearsal. With these concepts in mind, the facade should lean to the main street so the pedestrian can see the movements of students, quietly showing the trials and making the most playful and provocative facade to the city. A red curtain pierces the whole building. A flexible element that can be opened or closed according to the proposed activity in the space. It reinforces the concept that the school should be the stage of the city and experimentation. Location: The site is located in Nottingham, UK, limited by the Nottingham Canal, close to the Marina, in the south, by the Grove Road in the north and by housing in east and west sides. What is going on around: Masterplan designed as a group to Project 3 (computer drawing made by Emma Hewitt). The chosen location:
PRECEDENT STUDIES: Before beginning the project I made a research about three different schools, taking into account as the spaces, the organization of the plans, the design, the access and the context. 1. DS nursery in Japan, Hibino Sekkei and Youji no Shiro: Architect:s Hibino Sekkei and Youji no Shiro Location: Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan. Project Year: 2010 Construction System: timber beams and columns; Area: 1464.0 sqm Photographs: Studio Bauhaus References: Dezeen, ArchDaily Technical Drawings: WHY THIS PROJECT? This project interests me because I appreciate the idea that education must be conected with the external space. The inner courtyard connecting the internal classes with the external environments creates a system of perception about what is in and what is out, and breaks the traditional classroom style, improving the learning technics. I believe that this precedent will have a strong influence on my project because I also intend to create a free way of teaching site, making the streets and the city part of the class. 1. Carpenter Center Massachusetts, Le Corbusier Architect: Le Corbusier Location: Cambridge, Massachusetts Project Year: 1961 – 1963 Construction System: reinforced cast-in-place concrete masonry Area: 4,047m² Photographs: Flickr User: emily geoff References: Galinksy, GreatBuildings, Harverd website, Archdaily Technical Drawings: WHY THIS PROJECT? Like any work of Le Corbusier, this is another impressive. The building is clearly modernist and contrasts with the traditional architectonic style of Harvard, ensuring that building devoted to the visual arts must be an experience of freedom and creativity unbound. The plants allow flexibility in the spaces and uses, which is very useful for a building with this function, while the outer connection with the interior takes place very efficiently with the classic architecutral promenade designed by Le Corbusier. 3. Montpelier Community Nursery, AY Architects Architects: AY Architects Location: Camden, London Project Year: 2012 Construction System: cross-laminated timber panels Area: 135 m² Photographs: Dezeen References: Dezeen, Phaiton Atlas Technical Drawings: WHY THIS PROJECT?
Every day more we need to think about how the environment responds to human interventions and get a good building that does not harm the environment is the key. Montpelier Community Nursery is a sustainable design that has a creative method of opening and lighting, taking advantage of the site. In addition, it is a small and unique building that harmonizes with its surroundings, adding value to the gardens around and using them for the benefit of users. The conclusion would be that we have to take advantage of the site and the context and use it in your favor. |